This is not an argument against entrepreneurship. Its energy and creativity are essential. But leadership today must also recognise entrepreneurialism’s sleight of hand, its tendency to dress up novelty as transformational progress while obscuring slower, more sustainable paths.
We see that in the debates over artificial intelligence. In 2024, 28% of Danish companies reported using AI, the highest rate in the EU and more than double the European average. Businesses are racing to test generative AI to scale faster and prove their entrepreneurial edge. But today’s AI excitement is as much about hype as it is about technology. Such hype works like rocket fuel. It inflates valuations, attracts talent, and buys time while real results catch up. As capital floods into AI, hype itself is mobilised as a leadership tool. It allows leaders to project entrepreneurial daring, not through outcomes, but through amplified expectations, set against the grey predictability of established norms and institutions.
Still Hooked on HypeThis isn’t new. Hype has long served as a marker of distinction, elevating the unruly above the conventional. The word ‘hype’ began as slang for early twentieth-century drug addicts using hypodermic needles in the underworld. It later riffed through jazz countercultures, carried by their improvisational energy and rule-bending style, before finding its way into the startup world, where it fuelled an entrepreneurial leadership style that celebrated boundary-pushing misfits, like Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg.
Just as jazz thrived on improvisation against tradition, today’s debates about generative AI carry the same rebellious tune. They advance narratives of deviance (‘we’ll unleash it before regulators can react’), disruption (‘AI will replace the radiologist’), and rule-breaking (‘laws are for laggards; pioneers rewrite the rules’) in a bid to claim leadership of the AI revolution.