Uncertainty causes stressThe problem is real. According to the analytics company Gallup, 60% of the Danish population has felt stressed in the past year, and the number of Danes who are on long-term sick leave with stress has increased drastically in the past years. Every day, more than 35,000 Danes are on sick leave with work-related stress. Simultaneously, new research has debunked the myth that stress is a result of excess strain and points to the fact that the significant reasons for stress are often about fear of not being good enough at your job or not being able to live up to people’s expectations.
The title of Niels Åkerstrøm’s new lecture, “Den hyperansvarlige medarbejders tragedie (the tragedy of the hyper-responsible employee)”, which he has taken on tour these days, seems spot on. According to Åkerstrøm, there is a huge demand for new perspectives on the modern working life, however, he does take a critical view of a phenomenon such as ‘quiet quitting’ where you deliver nothing else but what your contract says and not one minute or one phone call more.
”Clearly, ’quiet quitting’ is a way of saying no to a lot of responsibility and look out for yourself, but I find it tragic if the solution is a distanced and passive approach to our jobs. I think ’quiet quitting’ must be interpreted as some sort of unrequited love. You love your job, but the feeling does not seem mutual, and then you distance yourself.”
Niels Åkerstrøm also points to something else significant; that the roots grow deep and are difficult to remove because there is still so much status in being driven by passion and be proud of your job.
”Most of us would like to have influence on our working hours and our tasks and would like to assume responsibility for our own career path and how we best realise and develop our potential. However, we also need recognition that we in fact take this responsibility, and this is practically non-existing in public organisations where leaders have so many employees that they often do not know what they are occupied with,” he says and elaborates:
”Many employees are not remotely close to being recognised enough for this. At best, it kills their motivation. At worst, it causes stress and ill-being.”
What is my responsibility today?What went wrong? To answer this, we need to go back in history.
The late 80s saw a fundamental shift in the public sector, where all institutions were asked to be self-adaptable and independent organisations. So, where the classical bureaucracy defines clear roles for employees with clearly defined duties, self-adaptable organisations need self-adaptable and agile employees, Niels Åkerstrøm explains.
”If the roles are clearly defined, it may perhaps impede change, so your role is now to define your own role depending on what is needed right now. The organisation’s responsibility goes meta and is about taking responsibility for the employees taking responsibility in an organisation that is constantly going somewhere new. Responsibility becomes something to constantly search for and create and thus it becomes elusive and indefinite,” he says.
His analysis thus shows that responsibility has been gradually placed on the individual employee over the past 35 years and is no longer tied up on rules or expertise. Instead, we must report to ourselves. What is needed today? In relation to this patient or in this learning situation?