It may sound like chaos, but it is not.Self-managing organisations are not without structure. On the contrary, they require greater clarity and more leadership – simply distributed differently. At Clever, MGS Design & Development and JAC, there are clear frameworks for coordination, decision-making and shared direction.
To understand the difference, we can take a closer look at what the classic hierarchy is actually built on.
At the core of the hierarchical model is the relationship between manager and employee. It is typically based on the manager as the decision-making authority. The manager holds the formal right to make the final decision and replace employees if disagreements arise.
According to researchers Amy Edmondson and Michael Lee, self-managing organisations represent a genuine break with the hierarchical model. Here, decision-making authority is radically and systematically decentralised throughout the organisation.
In practice, this takes place under labels such as teal, sociocracy and dynamic shared ownership – concepts that are gaining ground in Danish and international workplaces, as we showed in the book "Less hierarchy, more leadership". In our research project "www.selvledendeorganisationer.dk", we have explored the dynamics of these new organisational forms and examined how self-managing organisations unfolds in practice.
The research shows, among other things, that hierarchy does not disappear on its own. According to Casper Kirketerp Møller, it paradoxically requires existing power to be used actively to dismantle hierarchy and redistribute power. The research consistently points out that self-managing organisations do not evolve through roundtable discussions alone, but require clear direction and framing from management.
Freedom with responsibility is not the same as free play.In organisations such as Clever and Børns Vilkår, there are fixed meeting structures with clear rules for decision-making processes and systematic check-ins. In our research project, one employee explained that after just one week at Clever, he knew his team better than some of the management groups he had worked with for years in hierarchical organisations – precisely because of the formalised meeting culture.
At present, only a few companies are ready to abolish hierarchy entirely. But what can we learn from those who have gone the furthest?