"When we now have these productivity gains that everyone is talking about, who should benefit? Should it be the owners, who will become wealthier, or should it be that more people can enjoy a 4-day working week?" asks Michael Pedersen, Associate Professor and PhD at CBS, who has conducted research on the 4-day working week.
The 4-day working week has been widely discussed since the concept was first implemented in Denmark in 2017. Since then, the debate about a reduced working week has mainly focused on work-life balance and overall wellbeing, which are also highly relevant given that Danes consistently report feeling more stressed than in previous years.
The fact that the discussion now includes questioning some classic capital structures could have a significant impact on how widespread the phenomenon might become. So far, a reduced working week has mainly been adopted in smaller, owner-managed businesses, while municipalities have experimented with a 4-day working week, but without reducing the overall hours worked, which, according to Michael Pedersen, should not be compared directly.
The new debate
The primary cause of the debate about productivity gains lies in technological development, with generative AI as the central focus. Just over two years ago, ChatGPT was launched, and it has quickly become a collaborative partner in many offices around the country. For those working in knowledge-based roles, there could potentially be significant gains from using some form of generative AI, and it is here that the question arises: Should I just do more work for the same pay?
The reduced working week is an international phenomenon, and as such, the new aspect of the debate is also making headlines around the world. In the spring of 2024, it came to the forefront in the US after American senator Bernie Sanders went public, arguing that a larger proportion of Americans should work 32 hours a week instead of the current 40 hours. He referred to the increased productivity and argued that it should now also benefit the workers.
In Denmark, we have mostly seen the debate gain attention when parts of the public sector begin experimenting with working just 4 days a week. However, it is important to stress that these are primarily compressed workweeks rather than a reduced number of working hours.
The Best of Both Worlds?
The 4-day working week is known for having produced some remarkable results over the years. One striking example comes from 2019, when Microsoft tested the concept for 5 weeks by giving all its Japanese employees an additional day off each week. This time-limited experiment showed a 40% increase in productivity, which was noted worldwide, although it apparently was not adopted long-term by the company.
In Denmark, several private companies have also achieved good results after switching to a reduced workweek. One such company is Vest Administrationen, which provides property management and construction supervision services. According to Chief Financial Officer Morten Ahrendsen, it has been hard to see anything negative about the project: