Transformation, one of the buzzwords of our time, is certainly associated with a lot of ambiguity. Transformation promises the business world new market opportunities while posing challenges for companies that must face transformation with self-transformation.
Similarly the public sector is expected to transform itself to remain in sync with a society in transformation, e.g. regarding the green and digital transformation. Transformation seems not only to indicate a metamorphosis but a state of continuous transition, where the form is constantly becoming something new. The concept of transformation articulates a paradoxical expectation of a state in which the only constancy is constant transformation.
We have not always celebrated transformation. Over time organisations have dealt with change from exceedingly different leadership perspectives. Before World War II organisations were seen as formal entities with simple decision making based on past experience, bringing the past into the present as a decision premise.
After the war leadership was professionalised and organisations saw themselves as systems in an environment, now focusing on adaptation, with decisions based on future predictions, bringing the future into the present as a decision premise. The thinking was that market development could be forecasted in order for you to adapt to the future environment.
In the 1980s organisations left predictability behind and believed that change was the only constant. Instead of planning the future, a strategic capability was required to see the future as a horizon of possibilities and challenges.
Constant adaptability to an everchanging environment is in focus. Today, buzzwords like transformation, radical innovation, re-invention and disruption have radicalised this way of dealing with change. Knowing that the past and present form their images of the future, organisations no longer trust a future that is too risky to follow and instead now hunt new possibilities beyond the horizon. They look for the future of future, where potentialisation substitutes strategising, which requires questioning everything that is done. That is the core of transformative leadership.